Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Maure

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 11, 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 240 N.J.Super. 269, 573 A. 2d 186 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MaureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GartheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Bullet Hole, Inc. v. DunbarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  3. State v. GodshalkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. People v. UruburuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. State v. GosaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API