Legal Opinion

Tully v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 19, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ op Error to the Superior Court for New Castle County.

1Opinion of the Court

Spruance, J.:

This action was brought by the adminstrator of Henry Tully, deceased, for the recovery of damages for the death of the said Henry Tully, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the defendant.

The material facts as shown by the record are as follows: An engine and train crew of the defendant had shifted a box car, coal car, and stone car from the main track of the defendant’s road, in the City of Wilmington to a side track, known as the corn track, leaving the end of the stone car projecting over the main track. Immediately thereafter the said Henry Tully, aged about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ashworth v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Edgington ex rel. Meyer v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Burk v. Artesian Water Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Braderman v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API