Burk v. Artesian Water Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Richards, P. J.:
At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, I granted the defendant’s motion and directed a verdict for the defendant, on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prove that there was any negligence by the defendant, and the further ground that it appeared from the evidence that there was contributory negligence by the plaintiff.
The evidence introduced by the plaintiff disclosed that about 8:30 on the morning of July 11, 1951, Rudolph Thuman, who was an employee of the defendant, went to a place near the corner of Belmont Avenue and Eureka Street, in Richardson Park,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
- Charles C. Fulton Building Co. v. StichelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Lindsay v. CecchiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. GattaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
- Massey v. WorthSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- Frelick v. Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Logullo v. JoannidesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- McMilin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1968
- Halpern v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.