Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Massee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 24, 1996No. 93C-31338; CA A84859PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Wife appeals from a dissolution of marriage judgment, assigning error to the trial court’s property division. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we affirm.

The parties were married in February 1991. At the time of the trial, husband was 61 years of age and wife was 44. Husband has been a farmer for most of his adult life, and at the time of the marriage he owned substantial business and real estate holdings. Those holdings included the Mission Nut Company, the Mission Cherry Company, a farm, a residence, a large tract of land known as the “bayou property” and commercial buildings in Salem and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Carrigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Matter of Marriage of TroffoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. In Re the Marriage of CollingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API