Legal Opinion
United States v. Darrell Baclaan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1991No. 91-10043PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
Darrell Baclaan appeals the district court’s order imposing a sentence of two years imprisonment upon the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the court erroneously found that he “possessed” methamphetamine within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g). He also contends that, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(b)(2), a policy statement, the district court should have sentenced him to a one-year term of imprisonment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm the district court’s finding that Ba-claan “possessed” methamphetamine under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g). We vacate the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Theophilus BlackstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Mario Minota CarvajalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Linda LockardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rodney Eugene BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Harold DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Clarence TrotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Timothy Tyrone RockwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Jimmy Dale LeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.