Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Trotter
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 2001No. 00-4185PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Convicted of using unauthorized access devices, see 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), (e)(1), Clarence Trotter received a mild sentence: 5 months’ imprisonment and 36 months’ supervised release (5 months of which were to be spent in home confinement). He repeatedly violated the terms of home confinement by leaving without authorization, and he broke the rules of supervised release by lying to the probation office about his employment (and failing to notify the office about changes) and using marijuana. He tested positive for marijuana at least 3 times and skipped 7 scheduled…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Theophilus BlackstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Pope v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Ortiz, JoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jonus WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Clifford J. Lanas, Richard A. Hendershot, and James A. BattistaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Dwight D. Larson, Also Known as Dennis Larson, and Paul E. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.