Legal Opinion
Lloyds America v. Tinkelpaugh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 7, 1939No. 28490PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, J,
Tinkelpaugh obtained a judgment against Griffith for personal -injuries arising out of an automobile accident in which the car driven by Griffith was owned by one Earl E. Barnes, who gave Griffith permission to use the car. After execution was returned “no property found,” the plaintiff proceeded in garnishment against Lloyds America, an insurance company, which had issued an automobile accident insurance policy to Barnes. The garnishee answered in substance that it had issued the policy, but that it did not, by virtue thereof, befcome obligated to satisfy the plaintiff’s judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. TollefsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Frederiksen v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSUR. CORPORATION, LIMITED, OF LONDON, ENGLANDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vezolles v. Home Indemnity Co., New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Collins v. New York Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- O'NEILL v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co. of Seattle v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.