Legal Opinion

Luallin v. Koehler

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2002No. 20010301PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] The plaintiff investors, five individuals and two trusts, appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their action for damages against Condor Petroleum, Inc., and its president, Ronald Koehler (collectively referred to as “Condor”), alleging violations of the North Dakota Securities Act of 1951 (“Act”), under N.D.C.C. ch. 10-04. We hold the requirements for registration of securities and dealers under the Act do not apply because there was no sale or offer to sell securities from or within North Dakota by the defendants to these plaintiffs; the plaintiffs failed to raise…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Narum v. Faxx Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Perry Center, Inc. v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rio Grande Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Berg v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heart River Partners v. GoetzfriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Collette v. ClausenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ward v. BullisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Choice Financial Group v. SchellpfefferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API