Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Philadelphia Macaroni Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1949No. Civ. Nos. 6992, 7048, 7707, 7731PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, District Judge.

The four actions here involved were brought for overtime compensation, liquidated damages and a reasonable attorney’s fee under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act1 of 1938. Two of the actions were filed before the enactment of the Portal-to-Portal Act2; the others thereafter. The complaint in each of the actions, after alleging that the defendant was engaged in the production of goods for interstate commerce and that the employees on *333whose behalf the action was brought were also so engaged, simply recited that the defendant had violated the provisions of Sec.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Thomas v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
  4. Sadler v. W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
  5. Hess v. Factors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welsh v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Love v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Jeffers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API