Coyle v. Philadelphia Macaroni Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
The four actions here involved were brought for overtime compensation, liquidated damages and a reasonable attorney’s fee under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act1 of 1938. Two of the actions were filed before the enactment of the Portal-to-Portal Act2; the others thereafter. The complaint in each of the actions, after alleging that the defendant was engaged in the production of goods for interstate commerce and that the employees on *333whose behalf the action was brought were also so engaged, simply recited that the defendant had violated the provisions of Sec.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Thomas v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Sadler v. W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
- Hess v. Factors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Welsh v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Love v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Jeffers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955