Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Shapiro v. Dwelling Managers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1983Published

1ConcurrenceSilverman, J.

I would reverse the order appealed from and deny plaintiffs’ motion.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the memoranda of Justices Milonas and Kassal.

Plaintiffs’ motion, served with the summons and complaint, is essentially one for summary judgment asking for the full relief that the complaint asks; and the court granted that motion and relief and final judgment.

A motion for summary judgment cannot be made until after issue has been joined. (CPLR 3212, subd [a].) At the time this motion was made, issue had not been joined. Accordingly, it was improper to grant the motion.

If I were not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Third Sutton Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Lexann Realty Co. v. DeitchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Grayshaw v. New Amsterdam Apartments Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API