Legal Opinion
Grayshaw v. New Amsterdam Apartments Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin B. Stecher, J.
Although not so denominated, this appears to be a motion for summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action made prior to the joinder of issue. The defendants, for their part, do not seem to oppose such procedure feeling, apparently, as stated by their attorney, that “the issues in this motion are solely legal issues. The legal issue goes to the rights of the tenant under his lease and under Section 226B of the Real Properties [sic] Law to assign his lease without the landlord’s permission where the landlord acknowledges that his [sic presumably ‘he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cullen v. NaplesNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Pell v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Claim of Petterson v. Daystrom Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Kruger v. Page Management Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Essenfeld Bros. v. HostetterNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bragar v. Berkeley Associates Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- European-American Banking Corp. v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
- Bendes v. AlbertNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Shapiro v. Dwelling Managers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983