Hinkel v. Crowson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.
The plaintiff sued to foreclose an alleged vendor’s lien. The complaint alleges the sale and convey anee of the lot in question by plaintiff to one Florence G-. Hinkel for the price of $4,000 on November 27, 1914, the giving of a note for the price by said vendee; that it was agreed at the time that she would execute to the plaintiff a mortgage on the lot to secure the payment of the price, but that she failed to do so; that the price is unpaid, except to the amount of $510; that said Florence G-. Hinkel afterward married the defendant B. A. Crowson and thereupon filed a declaration of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Fallon v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hinkel v. CrowsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- In Re Mercury Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
- Delfelder v. Teton Land & Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Cameron v. ShuttleworthArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re Dickerson's EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.