J. Allen Smith & Co. v. Montgomery
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
It is well settled by the former decisions of this court that in order for these appellants to have acquired and enforced a lien upon the funds in the hands of this appellee, as receiver of the insolvent bank, they must have traced and identified the money collected for them by the Merchants’ Bank, as being on hand when this appellee took' over the affairs of said bank, and proof that he received or took over a fund into which the appellants’ money had been placed or with which it had been commingled will not suffice. Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. Walker, 195 Ala. 552, 70 South. 754; Nixon State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Driesbach v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bank of Florence v. United States Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. DowdU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Green v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Ex Parte MichieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Herron Motor v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Screws v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.