Legal Opinion

Screws v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 16, 1935No. 5 Div. 205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The bill seeks a preferential payment from funds of the Bank of Tuskegee, the affairs of which are now in liquidation by the state superintendent of banks. The aver-ments that at the time of the two deposits the bank was insolvent, with knowledge on the part of its officials and unknown to complainant, suffice to show that relation -of debtor and creditor did not arise. Receiving the money under such, circumstances would constitute a fraud on the depositor, and the title . thereto would remain in him. The money is therefore held in trust, and the depositor’s rights rest upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sims v. TigrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Widman v. KelloggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Commonwealth v. Tradesmen's Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Lusk Development & Improvement Co. v. GiintherWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hays v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Southland Inv. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Town of La Fayette v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API