Screws v. Williams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The bill seeks a preferential payment from funds of the Bank of Tuskegee, the affairs of which are now in liquidation by the state superintendent of banks. The aver-ments that at the time of the two deposits the bank was insolvent, with knowledge on the part of its officials and unknown to complainant, suffice to show that relation -of debtor and creditor did not arise. Receiving the money under such, circumstances would constitute a fraud on the depositor, and the title . thereto would remain in him. The money is therefore held in trust, and the depositor’s rights rest upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sims v. TigrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Widman v. KelloggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Commonwealth v. Tradesmen's Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Lusk Development & Improvement Co. v. GiintherWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hays v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Southland Inv. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Town of La Fayette v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936