Legal Opinion

Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1995No. C8-94-1813, C4-94-2036Published

1Opinion of the Court

529 N.W.2d 429 (1995)

John A. COCHRANE, Respondent (C8-94-1813), Appellant (C4-94-2036),

v.

TUDOR OAKS CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, an Ontario Limited Partnership, Nul Tiel, Respondent,

K.S.C.S. Properties, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Applicant for Intervention, Appellant (C8-94-1813).

Nos. C8-94-1813, C4-94-2036.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 28, 1995.

Review Denied May 31, 1995.

Jan Stuurmans, Law Offices of Jan Stuurmans, P.A., Minneapolis, for Cochrane.

Wood R. Foster, Jr., Jordan M. Lewis, Siegel, Brill, Greupner & Duffy, P.A., Minneapolis, for Tudor Oaks Condominium Project.

Laura J. Hanson,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Myers Through Myers v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API