Mandel v. M. Freeland
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
This is an action of assumpsit. The trial was had by the lower court without a jury and resulted in a finding for the plaintiff on November 25,1929. On November 29, motion for a new trial was made; on February J, this motion was dismissed for want of prosecution; on February 11th, judgment was entered on the finding; on February 19th, the court reinstated the motion for a new trial; on April 5th, the motion for new trial and judgment n. o. v. were dismissed; on April 14th, both motions were reinstated; and on May 28th, a. new trial was granted and the motion for judgment n. o. v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garland v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Blassotti v. Greensboro Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Dzaack v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929