Legal Opinion

Mandel v. M. Freeland

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1930No. Appeal 276Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

This is an action of assumpsit. The trial was had by the lower court without a jury and resulted in a finding for the plaintiff on November 25,1929. On November 29, motion for a new trial was made; on February J, this motion was dismissed for want of prosecution; on February 11th, judgment was entered on the finding; on February 19th, the court reinstated the motion for a new trial; on April 5th, the motion for new trial and judgment n. o. v. were dismissed; on April 14th, both motions were reinstated; and on May 28th, a. new trial was granted and the motion for judgment n. o. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garland v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Blassotti v. Greensboro Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Dzaack v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API