Dzaack v. Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
In this action to recover for personal injuries, an $8,640 verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff; the court below cut the award to $6,000; plaintiff filed of record an acceptance of the reduced verdict, but before judgment was entered thereon, and within the term, the court below directed a new trial, saying that the prior order, which it formally vacated, had been made “inadvertently before full consideration of the opinion of the trial judge was had by the other judges sitting in banc,” and “upon reconsideration, the court in banc [became] convinced that the verdict was so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fertax Co. v. SpiegelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Garland v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mervine v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Mandel v. M. FreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930