Legal Opinion

Garland v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1928No. Appeal, 91PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In its opinion granting a new trial, the court below stated: “We have reviewed and carefully considered all evidence and are of opinion that a just disposition of the case requires that it be retried.” In Fertax Co. v. Spiegelman, 292 Pa. 139, 140, we very recently said that, where a trial court states in its opinion that “the interests of right and justice require that the case shall be retried......we do not interfere on appeal”; that authority rules this case.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fertax Co. v. SpiegelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lamberton National Bank v. ShakespeareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Dzaack v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Mandel v. M. FreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930