Legal Opinion
Schomer v. Shilepsky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 22, 1975PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
The plaintiffs, Vivian and Jesse Schomer, brought this action seeking an injunction to prohibit the defendants from using a particular lot for commercial parking in violation of zoning regulations. The defendants answered that the lot was, in fact, located in a business zone and that its use for parking conformed to applicable regulations. The trial court concluded that the subject lot was situated in a residence zone and enjoined the defendants from using it for business purposes. From that judgment the defendants have appealed, assigning error in the court’s refusal to find material facts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Brauer v. FrecciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Taylor v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.