Legal Opinion

Jesus Arreola-Castillo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 3, 2018No. 17-1439PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Flaum, Circuit Judge.

*381 Petitioner Jesus Arreola-Castillo was convicted of a federal drug crime. Because he had at least two prior felony drug convictions in New Mexico, he was subject to the recidivism provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841 . Pursuant to that statute, he received a mandatory minimum sentence of life in prison. He subsequently challenged the underlying felony drug convictions in New Mexico state court, which the state court ultimately vacated. Now, he moves to reopen his federal sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , arguing that he is no longer subject to the recidivism enhancement because…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Christopher Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Monta Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Roger PaceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  4. Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. Joseph Brown v. Jeffrey KempCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API