Legal Opinion
City of Sault Ste. Marie, Mich. v. Andrus
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 31, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-1388PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. This motion raises procedural questions in this area which appear to be matters of first impression. In this suit, plaintiffs are the City of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, and three individual taxpayers of that city. It appears that a group of Indians claiming to be the Sault Ste. Marie tribe of Chippewa Indians has been acquiring land in the area surrounding the city and then conveying that land in trust to the United States pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. § 461,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Association of American Medical Colleges v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Starlie Lomayaktewa v. Stanley K. Hathaway, and Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Florida, Department of Business Regulation v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Tomac v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Neighbors for Rational Development, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- South Dakota v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.