Legal Opinion
The Lands Council v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 12, 2007No. 06-35781PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendants-Appellees’ letter dated February 15, 2007, requesting that the court strike or correct portions of the opinion is construed as a petition for panel rehearing and is ordered filed. The mandate issued February 12, 2007, is recalled to allow the court to rule on the petition for panel rehearing.
The Opinion filed on February 12, 2007, is amended as follows:
On slip opinion page 1951, lines 17-18, change “Indeed, the Forest Service’s own expert testified” to “For example, Intervenors’ expert, on whom the district court relied, testified”.
On slip opinion page 1952, line 9, change…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Native Ecosystems Council v. U.S. Forest Service, an agency of U.S. Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Clear Channel Outdoor Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ross A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. CouturierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Carlson v. US Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- The ON EQUITY SALES CO. v. ThiersDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.