Legal Opinion
Lands Council v. McNair
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 2007No. 07-35000PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FERGUSON; Concurrence by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Concurrence by Judge FERGUSON.
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
The Lands Council and the Wild West Institute (collectively, “Lands Council”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction to halt the Mission Brush Project (“Project”). Under the Project, the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service” or “Service”) plans to allow the selective logging of 3,829 acres of forest in the Idaho Panhandle National Forests (“IPNF”) for the purpose of restoring portions of the forest to historic conditions.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Friends of the Clearwater v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Clear Channel Outdoor Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lands Council v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.