Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 27, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff commenced this action seeking a determination that the disability insurance policy issued to the defendant was void and that the plaintiff’s only obligation was to return the premiums paid by the defendant. A master concluded that the policy was void because the defendant had failed to satisfy necessary conditions of the policy. The judge adopted the master’s report, and judgment was entered declaring the policy to be void upon the plaintiff’s payment to the defendant of the premiums paid plus interest. 1. The insurance policy states that “the Company shall incur no liability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michelson v. AronsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  2. Charles, Henry & Crowley Co. Inc. v. Home Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Faris v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Krause v. Equitable Life Insurance Co. of IowaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Joseph G. Warren, Sr. v. Confederation Life AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dean S. Edmonds, Jr. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Kobico, Inc. v. PipeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Yerardi v. Pacific Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  4. Sacks v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003
  5. Keegan v. Mt. Vernon Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API