Legal Opinion

Topazio v. Acme Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 2010No. 09 MA 124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vukovich, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Michael and Marilyn Topazio appeal the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, the Acme Company. The issue on appeal is whether Acme waived the argument concerning the violation of the saving statute or whether the raising of the affirmative defense of statute of limitations in an answer is sufficient to comply with Civ.R. 8(C). For the following reasons, we conclude that the failure to specifically raise the saving statute in an answer does not constitute waiver when the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lewis v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Reese v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Internatl. Periodical Distrib. v. Bizmart, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Eckmeyer v. BloughOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API