Legal Opinion

Internatl. Periodical Distrib. v. Bizmart, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2002No. 2001-0615PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 452.] INTERNATIONAL PERIODICAL DISTRIBUTORS, APPELLANT, v. BIZMART, INC., D.B.A. OFFICEMAX, APPELLEE. [Cite as Internatl. Periodical Distrib. v. Bizmart, Inc.,

2002-Ohio-2488.] Commercial transactions—R.C. 1302.98(C) is the saving statute to be applied to a commercial sales action. (No. 2001-0615—Submitted February 26, 2002—Decided June 12, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 77787. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT The saving statute to be applied to a commercial sales action is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greulich v. MonninOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. International Periodical Distributors v. Bizmart, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Charles v. Conrad, Unpublished Decision (11-17-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Wick v. Lorain Manor, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Brown v. Solon Pointe at Emerald RidgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Dolan v. GlousterOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API