Ex Parte Kelen
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
On the last appeal (Kelen v. Brewer, 221 Ala. 445, 129 So. 23), it was held the lunatic was a necessary party complainant, and that the suit could not be maintained alone in the name of the guardian. Upon remandmeht, the bill was amended as one by “Lula Turner, a non compos mentis by her guardian Alex Brewer.”
It is here insisted the allowance of this amendment was error upon the theory that it worked an entire change of parties, and that the cause was due to be discontinued. Petitioner relies primarily upon Fowlkes v. Memphis, etc., R. R. Co., 38 Ala. 310, and Dougherty v. Powe, 127 Ala. 577,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lucas v. PittmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Manistee Mill Co. v. HobdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- American Union Telegraph Co. v. DaughterySupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Kelen v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Dougherty v. PoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. UsherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ex Parte CabanissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Scott v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947