Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Usher

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 16, 1933No. 7 Div. 182PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The defendant was brought into court to answer the complaint of “Birdie Usher, administratrix of the estate of John Moragne, deceased.”

The caption of the complaint is in the following words: “Birdie Usher, Administratrix of the Estate of John Moragne, Deceased, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a Corporation.”

The complaint consists of three counts. The first count in no way pretends to state a cause of action in plaintiff’s representative capacity against the - defendant. In counts 2 and 3, however, the plaintiff “avers that she is the administratrix of the estate of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Brooklyn Life Insurance v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Lucas v. PittmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. ZivitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Doughty v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API