Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Koch

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1949No. Civ. 16625PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for the recovery of the sum of $2,362.05, designating their complaint as one for reformation of a contract and for damages. They were awarded the amount prayed for and the defendant appeals.

The cause of action is upon a written contract which the trial court found entitled plaintiffs to receive for their services as real estate brokers, the difference between $25,000 for which defendant’s property was sold, and $22,500 which defendant agreed to accept for the property.

The controversy hinges upon the construction to be given to the agreement of sale between…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. In Re the Marriage of Marion E.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Homefinders v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API