Eastern Appraisal Services, Inc. v. State of North Carolina
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, John C., Judge.
Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact exist and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 56; Long v. Vertical Technologies, Inc., 113 N.C. App. 598, 439 S.E.2d 797 (1994). There are no genuine issues of material fact present in the case before us. The sole question for our determination is whether defendants’ actions constituted a taking of plaintiffs property, entitling plaintiff to just compensation under the constitutions of the United States and North Carolina. We hold that no compensable taking…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. North Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hillsboro Partners, LLC v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- City of Concord v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Buck Island, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Massey v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007