Legal Opinion

State v. Contreras

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2004No. S-04-273PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

NATURE OF CASE

In this error proceeding brought by the State pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2315.01 (Supp. 2003), we are primarily asked to provide an answer to the question whether it is proper for the trial court to include an aiding and abetting instruction in its charge to the jury where the charging document does not specifically recite aiding and abetting language. We conclude that it is proper to give an aiding and abetting instruction where warranted by the evidence, notwithstanding the fact that the document charging the defendant does not include aiding and abetting language. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. LeonorNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MarcoNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. McLeodNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. VasquezNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BarfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HenseNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API