Legal Opinion

Hard v. Hollywood Turf Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1955No. Civ. 20434; Civ. 20433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Plaintiffs Dan E. Hard and Harry Macofsky were employees of Arenz-Warren Company, a subcontractor who did painting on a grandstand of the Hollywood Turf Club which was in the course of being reconstructed. Defendant L. E. Dixon Company, a corporation, was the general contractor on the project. Plaintiffs were engaged as painters, employed by Arenz-Warren Company. Both sustained serious personal injuries when a high scaffolding which was erected and the materials for which were furnished by the subcontractor Arenz-Warren Company, and upon Avhich they were working, collapsed and dropped them to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Hard v. Hollywood Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Lindsey v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API