Legal Opinion

Burstein v. Zelman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1960No. Civ. 24165PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

The appeal in this ease was dismissed by this court for want of a supporting record ((Cal.App.) 3 Cal.Rptr. 446) ; in footnote 1 of the opinion the contents of the record were enumerated. The Supreme Court granted a hearing and a motion of appellant to augment the record by including a certified copy of the findings of fact, conclusions of law and the judgment; the cause was thereupon retransferred to this court.

Approaching the matter on the merits we now find ourselves confronted with findings which in the main declare the allegations of the pleadings to be true or untrue, but the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Kovacik v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kelly v. Sparling Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Goldring v. ChudacoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melvin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  2. Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Lundblade v. PhoenixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Colligan v. CaprioNassau County District Court · 1964
  5. Melvin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API