Dailey v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
A jury convicted Gary W. Dailey of three counts of failing to comply with the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act (ASORA). 1 On appeal, Dailey contends that Magistrate David S. Landry erred when he refused to dismiss the three charges, when he instructed the jury on the definition of “knowingly,” when he refused to allow Dailey to introduce evidence that he had subsequently complied with ASORA, and when he denied Dailey’s motion for a judgment of acquittal. For the reasons below, we affirm Dailey’s convictions.
Facts and proceedings
Dailey was required to register as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wilson v. Lucerne Canal and Power Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Jordan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Rantala v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.