Legal Opinion

Graham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 16, 2006No. CR 05-1018PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant Edith Graham was charged with the crime of permitting the abuse of a child. Her then-husband, Nick Graham, was charged in the same felony information with second-degree battery. See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-13-202 (Repl. 1997). Both charges stemmed from injuries sustained by the Grahams’ son, Anthony. Prior to trial, Edith Graham moved to dismiss the charges against her, arguing that the statute under which she was charged, Ark. Code Ann. § 5-27-221 (Supp. 2003), impermissibly shifted the burden of proof of an essential element of the crime to the defense; she also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Reinert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Law v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Heydenrich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API