United States v. Norwood
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
ORLOFSKY, District Judge:
Defendant, Michael Norwood, who is pro se, has filed post-trial motions: (1) for a judgment of acquittal as to Counts Four and Six of the Second Superseding Indictment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(c); (2) for a bifurcated trial; (3) to preclude the United States from making any reference to the Defendant’s post-arrest silence; and (4) to have Lori Koch, Esq., relieved as stand-by counsel for the Defendant.
Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal of Count Four of the Second Superseding Indictment, which charges a violation of the 1994 amendment to the federal…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. James Manuel RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Jeffrey Anderson, A/K/A Jonathan ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. LakeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997