Legal Opinion

United States v. Norwood

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1996No. Criminal 96-232PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORLOFSKY, District Judge:

Defendant, Michael Norwood, who is pro se, has filed post-trial motions: (1) for a judgment of acquittal as to Counts Four and Six of the Second Superseding Indictment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(c); (2) for a bifurcated trial; (3) to preclude the United States from making any reference to the Defendant’s post-arrest silence; and (4) to have Lori Koch, Esq., relieved as stand-by counsel for the Defendant.

Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal of Count Four of the Second Superseding Indictment, which charges a violation of the 1994 amendment to the federal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. James Manuel RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Jeffrey Anderson, A/K/A Jonathan ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. LakeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
  4. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API