Legal Opinion
Matter of Lawrence
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1986No. 86-428PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a review of a report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility which found that respondent JePhunneh Lawrence violated Disciplinary Rule 7-101(A)(l) by intentionally failing to seek his client’s lawful objectives and DR 7-101(A)(2) by intentionally failing to carry out an employment contract for professional services. The Board recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days. After a careful review of the record, we accept the Board’s findings and adopt its recommended sanction.
The violations here arise out of a series of meetings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of KnoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re JamisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Mills v. CooterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992