Legal Opinion

Wachovia B. & T. Co. v. American Bank. Ins. Co. of Fla.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966No. 365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The only assignment of error and the only exception entered by appellant is to the entry of the judgment appearing in the record, which judgment it contends is erroneous because of error made by the court below in interpreting the effect of the facts as set forth in the stipulation of facts.

The plaintiff and the defendant agree that the draft involved herein was non-negotiable. It was issued in Cincinnati, Ohio, on 20 December 1963, and contains the following language: “Pay only to Walter E. Bell and Federal Credit Union — Eight Hundred Eighty-Four and 00/100 — Dollars in full settlement,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Drinkall v. Movius State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Walker v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Causey v. EilandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Fairchild v. . the Ogdensburgh, Clayton and Rome R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1857
  5. First National Bank v. Rhode Island InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Denham Springs v. South Carolina Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. First Nat. Bank of Denham Springs v. South Carolina Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API