Legal Opinion

Causey v. Eiland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1928PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, O. J.,

(after stating the facts). The decree of the chancellor was correct. The rule governing the liability of a bank on a certified check has been clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Alabama as follows:

“A certified check has a distinctive character as a species of commercial paper, the certification constituting a new contract between the holder and the certifying bank; the funds of the drawer are, in legal contemplation, withdrawn from his credit and appropriated to the payment of the check, and the bank becomes the debtor of the holder as for money paid and received.” National…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Commercial Bank v. Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Merchants & Planters Bank v. New First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nat. Newark & Essex Bank v. GiordanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Wertz v. Richardson Heights Bank and TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Pennsylvania v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. McIntire v. RaskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. In re the Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API