Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. . the Ogdensburgh, Clayton and Rome R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1857PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

The complaint contains a distinct averment of an indebtedness by the defendant to the plaintiffs, for work and labor to an amount equal to the sum claimed. The paper which it is alleged was given for this indebtedness was not a bill of exchange. The idea of a bill, under the law merchant, supposes the existence of a party other than the drawee, to whom the bill is addressed, and who is therein requested to pay the amount to the holder on account of the drawer. Here the party with whom the plaintiffs dealt was the corporation which, being an artificial person, could only act by agents, The…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Shankland.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wolcott v. Van SantvoordNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Fink v. Canyon Road Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Bull v. . SimsNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Cable & Wireless, Ltd. v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API