Legal Opinion

Pool v. McKune

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 16, 1999No. 79,323, 79,324, 79,325, 79,327, 79,328, 79,475, 79,535, 79,733, 79,744, 79,859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

The petitioners are. convicted sex offenders serving time at the Lansing Correctional Facility (LCF). They appeal from a district court decision holding that plethysmograph testing as a component of the Sexual Abuse Treatment Program (SATP) did not violate their constitutional rights under the Fourth or Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution. All cases involving these questions are consolidated for purposes of this appeal. We dismiss in part and affirm in part.

LCF administrators determine which inmates must participate in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Frederick Anthony Mitchell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  4. State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API