Legal Opinion

Rice v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 20, 2004No. 89,759PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

Petitioners, who are inmates at Lansing Correctional Facility (LCF), challenge the constitutionality of two of respondents’ regulations. The first, K.A.R. 44-12-601(q)(l), requires that all inmate purchases of books, newspapers, and periodicals be made through their inmate account. The second, Internal Management Policy and Procedure (IMPP) 11-101, among other things, limits the amount of inmates’ monthly spending. The joint effect is to restrict the amount of subscriptions to newspapers and magazines the inmates receive — through monetarily…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jacklovich v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Hooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  4. Chubb v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. Litzinger v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API