Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 31, 2003No. 88,046PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gernon, ].:

In this criminal appeal, Juan Pablo Martinez challenges the constitutionality of the Kansas statute which requires an individual to provide blood and saliva samples for a DNA database after a conviction of burglary. We affirm.

Martinez was charged with one count each of felony aggravated burglary and misdemeanor theft. Martinez entered an Alford plea to one count of burglary pursuant to K.S.A. 21-3715. The district court sentenced Martinez to 24 months’ probation and required him to provide blood and saliva samples for the DNA database in…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. ScarboroughTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API