Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Dundee Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1933No. 41791PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

It will clarify the discussion to note first the particular grounds on which the appellee resists the appellant’s claim. These are as follows: (1) That one who is debtor to an insolvent may not interpose as an offset a claim purchased by him after the insolvency; (2) that a joint debt cannot be set off against a separate debt; (3) that a defendant cannot set off a demand which he is not entitled to sue in his own name; (4) that an executor cannot, in an action against him individually, interpose as a counterclaim a debt due his testator’s estate.

The foregoing grounds apply in the main to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Gardner v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Andrew v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Andrew v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Briley v. Board of Supervisors of Story CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  5. Marmarth School District No. 12 v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API