Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Northrop Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1988No. B023338PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Pauline Anderson (Pauline) appeals from an order of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained demurrers to her causes of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress and loss of consortium. These claims arose from the allegedly wrongful termination of her husband Roger E. Anderson (Roger) by defendant Northrop Corporation (Northrop). We find that Pauline failed to set forth facts establishing she was a direct victim of Northrop’s assertedly tortious conduct and that Roger did not suffer sufficient mental or physical harm to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Hardin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Tollefson v. Roman Catholic Bishop of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 13,545 General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Gary D. Doupnik, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API