Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 13,545 General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Gary D. Doupnik, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1993No. 92-15166PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Gary Doupnik appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of General Motors in its diversity action for equitable indemnity under California law. The court ordered indemnity from Gary Doupnik for 80 percent of a $1.6 million loss of consortium judgment that was rendered in favor of Sally Doupnik, Gary’s spouse, in an underlying state action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

On January 8, 1983, Gary Doupnik and a friend were returning from a wedding reception when Doupnik lost control of the General Motors car…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Allen v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Showa Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Citizens for a Better Environment-California v. Union Oil Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
  4. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORT OF ASTORIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. In Re NorrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API