Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 22, 2010No. 08-4184PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Heathcliffe John Bradley, a citizen and national of New Zealand, seeks review of a final removal order of the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“the Department”). Bradley contends that the Department’s removal order is void under Woodby v. INS, 385 U.S. 276, 286, 87 S.Ct. 483, 17 L.Ed.2d 362 (1966), because the record lacks “clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence” that he waived his right to contest his removal under the Visa Waiver Program (“VWP”), 8 U.S.C. § 1187. Bradley additionally contends…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo, United States of America v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mohammed Nasir Khan v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bingham v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Gustavo Nardea v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Berwind Corp. v. ApfelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Harold Riera-Riera v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- O'Riordan v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.