Anderson v. Lynch
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
1. One of the questions for decision is whether the restrictive covenants contained in the deed to Lynch created, or conveyed to the plaintiffs, a property right or interest in the lot of this defendant. It seems that this identical question has not before been presented to this court for determination. Restrictive agreements of this nature are sometimes spoken of as covenants running with the land, and sometimes as creating reciprocal negative easements. Still other terms have been employed. Hancock v. Gumm, 151 Ga. 667, 673 (107 S. E. 872,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Moore v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Southern Railway Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Board of Public Instruction v. Town of Bay Harbor I.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Morley v. Jackson Redevelopment AuthorityMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Meagher v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. McNeillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.