Legal Opinion · Dissent

Internet Specialties West, Inc. v. Milon-Digiorgio Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 2009No. 07-55087, 07-55199Published

1DissentKleinfeld, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

“[Ejquity aids the vigilant, not those who slumber on their rights, or Vigilanti-bus non dormientibus, aequitas subvenit ...."1

The majority opinion could have used what Learned Hand wrote about prejudice, and left it at that:

[the plaintiff] did nothing; not a word of protest, or gesture of complaint, escaped it for six years more; and still [defendant’s business] kept increasing. What equity it can have the hardihood now to assert; how it can expect us to stifle a competition which with complete complaisance, and even with active encouragement, it has allowed for years…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  4. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Tisch Hotels, Inc., Americana Hotel Operating Corporation v. Americana Inn, Inc., Americana Motor Courts, Inc., Americana Catering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API