Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ayotte, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 17, 2005No. CV-04-321-JDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Smith v . Ayotte, et a l . CV-04-321-JD 02/17/05 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Phillip Smith et a l . v. N o . 04-321-JD Opinio n N o .

2005 DNH 027

Kelly Ayotte et a l . O R D E R The defendants, Attorney General Kelly Ayotte and members of the New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals (collectively, the “state defendants”) and the towns of Hollis and Hudson, New Hampshire (collectively, the “town defendants”) have moved to dismiss this action challenging certain aspects of the New Hampshire property taxation statute embodied in Revised Statutes Annotated…

2Cases cited23 opinions

Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Duckworth v. SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
Edmund H. Linn v. Andover Newton Theological School, Inc., Edmund H. Linn v. Andover Newton Theological School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.